
‘Anti-dobbing’ culture responsible for workplace bullying in Australia
Australia’s ingrained ‘anti-dobbing’ culture may be hindering efforts to stamp out workplace bullying and harassment, which remains a serious issue for Australian businesses, according to Harmers Workplace Lawyers.
Greg Robertson, General Counsel for Harmers Workplace Lawyers, says the first step for employers in creating an anti-bullying workplace culture is to address the cultural issue of employees refusing to ‘dob in’ their work colleagues.
“Australian workplaces tend to have a ‘don’t dob in’ mindset, which hinders attempts to eradicate workplace bullying,” Mr Robertson said.
“A number of bullying cases recently have highlighted situations where employees have, for whatever reason, stood by and done nothing to report or stop the incident. These cases contain lessons for all employers,” he said.
“Staff should be encouraged to come forward and alert senior management to any incidents of bullying, harassment or discrimination they may witness. They need to know that any form of mistreatment will be taken seriously and that their role in alerting management to the issue will remain confidential.
“Having said that, employers understandably do not want to create a ‘culture of complaint’ within their workplace, in which false, petty or vexatious bullying claims are continually brought to the attention of management.
“For this reason, we recommend employers establish a policy whereby employees face some form of reprimand if they bring a complaint found to be false or unfounded,” he said.
Mr Robertson said organisations needed to ensure their HR teams had people skilled in investigating workplace bullying so that complaints are properly addressed. This included the ability to discern what is and what is not bullying.
“Bullying is generally accepted as unwanted behaviour that offends, persecutes or excludes an individual within the workplace. Bullying behaviour typically breaches any number of workplace legislation such as OH&S or discrimination, and may even breach criminal laws,” he said.
Mr Robertson said the key to eradicating workplace bullying was to implement and apply firm office policies and procedures that demonstrate employers and managers will not turn a blind eye to bullying or harassment.
“Achieving cultural reform within the workplace requires a clear management commitment not only to respecting the dignity of all employees, but also to implementing robust systems to achieve this,” he concluded.
I would say it’s a bit wider than that. In general, employees serve their own personal interests at work, viewing their employer as a separate, external and often heartless entity. Therefore, they work to the letter of their contracts and job descriptions and do very little else.
Regrettably, this keeps many Australian companies in the dark ages and hinders the overall progress of Australia’s economy.
As the article points out, this attitude is definitely supported and even encouraged by authoritarian management and top-down hierarchies.
The answer is to consider employees internal work motivation, i.e. their need to feel validated as individuals, safe and appreciated. Australian companies should look to leaders like Google for examples on how to get the most out of employees by keeping them happy, free to choose, engaged and socially responsible.
Good luck to all of us,
Gal
Actually Australians are becoming a ‘dobbing’ nation. Too, government agencies are continually encouraging people to dob on others for many different reasons.
As for not dobbing on those bullies in the workplace, there usually isn’t any point. Many times the bullies are those in charge and the higher ups are not willing to do anything about it. Bosses even go so far as to excuse the bully in some instances. I have seen instances where the bullying is not hidden and still nothing is done.
Some are more expendable then others. So you have to ask whats the point of dobbing on a bully when nothing is done anyway.
I’d say the real problem is what happens to people who try to assert supposedly protected legal rights.
I was stalked, subjected to further harassment, and kept under the poverty line by malicious references from my former employer. Two friends who witnessed some of the heinous actions taken by my then employer were explicitly threatened when they spoke up.
“Dobbing” can consume years of your life, huge amounts of money and take a terrible emotional toll. You may as well just flush your career down the toilet.
Song Title: “STAND”
Subject: Dealing with spiteful people
Hear it at URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3MxZcls24o
All work places should be safe.
Bullying is unlawful and should be stopped. See the police.
Defamation has always been a difficult law to pursue despite many abuses felt by employees on basic issues of job titles to more subtle abuses of race. However UK and US law has great strength.Defamation—also called calumny, vilification, traducement, slander (for transitory statements), and libel (for written, broadcast, or otherwise published words)—is the communication of a statement that makes a claim, expressly stated or implied to be factual, that may give an individual, business, product, group, government, or nation a negative image. It is usually a requirement that this claim be false and that the publication is communicated to someone other than the person defamed (the claimant).In common law jurisdictions, slander refers to a malicious, false,[not specific enough to verify] and defamatory spoken statement or report, while libel refers to any other form of communication such as written words or images.Most jurisdictions allow legal actions, civil and/or criminal, to deter various kinds of defamation and retaliate against groundless criticism. Related to defamation is public disclosure of private facts, which arises where one person reveals information that is not of public concern, and the release of which would offend a reasonable person. “Unlike [with] libel, truth is not a defense for invasion of privacy.”[not verified in body.False light laws are "intended primarily to protect the plaintiff's mental or emotional well-being."[5] If a publication of information is false, then a tort of defamation might have occurred. If that communication is not technically false but is still misleading, then a tort of false light might have occurred.In most civil law jurisdictions, defamation is dealt with as a crime rather than a tort.A person who destroys another’s reputation may be referred to as a famacide, defamer, or slanderer. The Latin phrase famosus libellus means a libelous writing. The biggest favour I can give for anybody seeing defamation or slander is to use foresight and file witness statements, make notes, record and process through a case far ahead of seeing the lawyer. Often victims remain victims of bad employers with abusive staff because the victim does not have the foresight to provide proofs for the honourable Court processes. Simply GET THE PROOFS OF DEFAMATION QUICKLY AND BEFOREHAND and then file a lawsuit with confidence.
Best Wishes,
Dinesh R Makwana